TL;DR Committing to the equity financing process is a strategic business decision by the founder because of the nature of the ventures and the potential upside of “selling” equity at an early stage of the firm's lifecycle to achieve its competitive advantage.
You may have heard both arguments, but there is no one-size-fits-all answer due to the nuances behind each perspective. The guiding principle is how venture capital money can help founders generate value.
There are three key scenarios of venture capital (or risk capital) that are the most effective in creating value for the ventures for founders:
The least effective (or ‘expensive’) way to use venture capital money is to fund the runway of operations (bridging) because the rate of losing money is faster than the cash the business generates.
Founders’ bargaining power always correlates to their ability to deliver venture performance and drive shareholder value. If you raise before traction, you don’t have much to say if you need the money to sustain - you might just take whatever is offered.
Ask yourself: Are you a founder who can still be equally motivated to run the ventures after giving out controls and equity away to finance the growth of the business in multiple rounds?
The answer lies in the ownership (actual share left and intrinsic motivation) you want to hold in counterbalancing the tradeoffs you get to grow the business.
Inherently VCs want to bet on great founders in a vast market.
Betting on founders is essentially saying “I am betting on someone I trust to return a great deal of money back to me”. This comes in the form of:
The fundraising deck is one of the many key materials you need to communicate your business and your ability to drive fast growth to investors (individual or institutional).
TL;DR It is very unlikely that you will raise a lot of money from a serious investor just from a 10-page pitch deck without any other forms of justification and supporting documentation to show that you can manage the money you are asking for.